🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over Formation & Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when issued by a man with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Authority In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Soccer Order: Directors Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss him for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then discard them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.